سفارش تبلیغ
صبا ویژن

Israeli settlers injure Palestinian shepherd and his son

 
 
An Israeli soldier scuffles with a Palestinian farmer as villagers are prevented from working on their lands in the West Bank village of Tuqua. (File photo)
An Israeli soldier scuffles with a Palestinian farmer as villagers are prevented from working on their lands in the West Bank village of Tuqua. (File photo)
Six Israeli settlers have attacked and badly injured a Palestinian shepherd and his son in the occupied West Bank city of Ramallah, reports say.



The Monday assault happened outside the village of Michmas near the city of Ramallah, where the settlers took away 47-year-old Nagheh Thanjbeh and his son in a car at knife-point and brutally beat them.

The attackers then stabbed the man in the head and broke all his fingers. They also fractured the boy’s hands and killed two sheep belonging to them. The victims have been shifted to a Ramallah hospital.

In recent years, Israeli settlers in the West Bank have often assaulted Palestinians and vandalized their property. However, the Tel Aviv regime rarely detains the assailants.

The Israeli regime maintains a defiant stand on the issue of its illegal settlements on Palestinian land as it refuses to freeze settlement expansion. Tel Aviv has come under repeated and widespread international condemnation over the issue.

More than half a million Israelis live in over 120 illegal settlements built since the 1967 Israeli occupation of the Palestinian territories of the West Bank and East al-Quds (Jerusalem).

Human rights groups accuse Tel Aviv of ignoring complaints by the victims of settler attacks.

PG/SS/SL


Bhbvjh repression in Bahrain, America has sent an aircraft carri

 

flight deck Nymytz

Aircraft carrier

Bahrain regime"s violent crackdown on anti-regime protesters, while it has increased, Navhvpyma on Nymytz Yvasas America (USS Nimitz) is one of the world"s largest warships are stationed off the coast of Bahrain.



Nymytz ship with five hundred seamen in territorial waters of Bahrain will be present for 5 days.

The ship was posture while the 14 August (23 August) and also the anniversary of Bahrain"s independence from the British new wave of protests against the Al Khalifa regime has begun.

After America"s spy agencies may have claimed another "great" by Al occurs in this month, the country"s embassies and consulates across the Middle East and North Africa were closed last Sunday.

However, officials at America"s naval base in Bahrain, where the Navy V America is present in said operations "regular" is followed.

Popular uprising in Bahrain began February 14, 2011. As soon as the rise of al-Khalifa regime, the violent repression of peaceful protesters began calling for military support from its Arab neighbors was.

The protesters called for the overthrow Hamad bin Isa Al Khalifa, Bahrain"s ruling.

According to the New York Times, protesters in Bahrain are increasingly anti-American slogans and Washington due to their increased arming and supporting the Bahraini regime condemned.

Administration of Barack Obama, America"s president in May, a major military pact with Bahrain Manama resumed the fury of opposition activists were followed. Opponents of the military covenant, to be a sign of support for America from the oppressive rule against protesters in Bahrain.

Previously, a $ 53 million sale of military equipment to Bahrain America Convention in September had been suspended.


Iran’s Majlis debate on Cabinet nominees enters 4th day

 
A general view of Iran
A general view of Iran"s Majlis during debates on President Hassan Rouhani"s Cabinet nominees
Members of Iran’s Majlis have begun a fourth day of the debate to review the qualifications of the Cabinet ministers proposed by President Hassan Rouhani.



Thursday’s parliamentary session started off with a speech by the nominee for the minister of Industry, Mines and Trade Mohammad-Reza Ne’matzadeh, who responded to the criticism put forward against him by some MPs in Wednesday’s session and briefly explained his plans for the ministry in case he receives a vote of confidence from Majlis.

Following the speech by Ne’matzadeh, the legislators began debating the qualifications of Cabinet nominee for the Ministry of Science, Research and Technology Jafar Mili-Monfared.

Under the Majlis bylaws, MPs take turns to speak for and against a Cabinet pick before the nominee responds to their concerns and criticism and defends his qualifications and plans.

Meanwhile, shortly after the proceedings began on Thursday, President Rouhani entered the Majlis floor and was welcomed by Speaker Ali Larijani.

The Majlis members have so far reviewed the credentials of 13 Cabinet picks, and begun their debate on the qualifications of the remaining five, namely Ali Jannati nominated to head the Ministry of Culture and Islamic Guidance; Bijan Zanganeh, the Ministry of Oil; Hamid Chitchian, the Ministry of Energy; and Masoud Soltanifar for the Ministry of Sports and Youth.

The legislators will each cast a vote for or against the proposed ministers after wrapping up the debates on their credentials.

If the debates conclude on Thursday, a vote is expected later in the day. However, debate will continue on Saturday if the MPs do not have enough time to review the credentials of all remaining nominees on Thursday.

Rouhani submitted his proposed Cabinet lineup during his swearing-in ceremony in Majlis on August 4.

If any of the nominees fails to receive a vote of confidence, Rouhani will have up to three months to name a replacement.

MFB/NN/HJL


Iran expects ‘practical and constructive’ steps from US: Rohani

Iran’s President Hassan Rohani says the Islamic Republic is closely monitoring all measures taken by the United States and will respond properly to Washington’s “practical and constructive” moves.


“What is important for us is the US administration’s practical response and not statements,” Rohani said on Tuesday in his first press conference since he took office on August 4.

He added that the Iranian nation’s vote in the June 14 presidential election was a “very serious and meaningful” measure, stressing that the US officials have not given an appropriate and practical response deserving the Iranian people’s choice.

In response to the White House statement about the US readiness to work with Iran on the nuclear energy program in case of Tehran’s serious engagement, the Iranian president stated that Washington is pursuing “contradictory” approaches.

“The recent statement by the White House makes it clear that certain US officials do not have an accurate and complete understanding of our country’s facts, recent election and the Iranian nation’s message,” Rohani stated.

He urged the US to hear the Iranian nation’s message, saying “If we see that the US is serious in resolving the problems, we will also be serious.”

The Iranian Chief Executive expressed regret that the “warmongering group” in the US opposes constructive talks and is serving the interests of a certain country.

Shortly after Rohani’s swearing-in ceremony on Sunday, the US said it is prepared to work with Iran’s new administration on the nuclear issue.

“The inauguration of President Rohani presents an opportunity for Iran to act quickly to resolve the international community"s deep concerns over Iran"s nuclear program," said White House spokesman, Jay Carney.

"Should this new government choose to engage substantively and seriously to ... find a peaceful solution to this issue, it will find a willing partner in the United States," Carney added.

Rohani stated that his administration will firmly safeguard the Iranian nation’s rights through constructive interaction in future negotiations.

“If there are practical and constructive measures, the Iranian administration will definitely give responses similarly and accordingly,” the president pointed out.

Rohani also voiced the Islamic Republic’s readiness to hold talks with any country within the framework of Iran’s national interests.

He recommended White House officials to make decisions in accordance with the realities.

The US has imposed several rounds of illegal sanctions on Iran, which Washington claims to be aimed at pressuring Tehran to abandon its nuclear energy program.

The US, Israel and some of their allies falsely claim that Iran is pursuing non-civilian objectives in its nuclear energy program, with Washington and the European Union using the unfounded allegation as a pretext to impose illegal sanctions on Iran.

In its latest measure against Iran, the US House of Representatives last Wednesday approved a bill to impose tougher sanctions on Tehran’s oil exports and financial sector.

The bill, which must be approved by the Senate and signed by President Barack Obama to become law, seeks to cut Iran"s oil exports by one million barrels per day over a year.

Tehran has categorically rejected West"s accusations, arguing that as a signatory to the Non-Proliferation Treaty and a committed member of the International Atomic Energy Agency, it is entitled to develop nuclear technology for peaceful purposes.

US Congress still hostile to Iran: William Beeman



Tue Aug 6, 2013 6:10PM GMT

 

Press TV has conducted an interview with William Beeman, professor at the University of Minnesota, about Iran’s new President Hassan Rohani saying that warmongering lobby groups in the US are blocking constructive talks between Tehran and Washington.


What follows is an approximate transcription of the interview.

Press TV: Mr. Beeman, of course we are speaking here about the future in terms of relations between Iran and the United States. This was an issue that raised a lot during the press conference today by Mr. Hassan Rohani.

Now Mr. Rohani, I am just quoting him, he has said that the US is adopting a dual-track approach towards Iran and he was saying this is because of pressure from lobby groups that are persuading US lawmakers to make decisions that even at times go against American interest.

Now do you see what’s been called the dual-track policy a result of that pressure group?

Beeman: Absolutely. The United States has from the beginning of the Obama administration been on record saying that they want to have peaceful negotiations with Iran to resolve the differences between the two countries. But every single time that the United States appears to becoming closer to reaching some kind of solution with Iran, then interest groups in the United States try to torpedo that effort.

We have seen when from the election of President Rohani who has been assessed as being a moderate in Iran, that Mr. Rohani was under attack from the very first day of his election with actually frankly lies about his past.

People questioned his doctorate degree, they claimed that he was involved in bombings in Argentina, all of which are completely lies. But they were in attempt to try to discredit Mr. Rohani because people who saw the United States might move closer to reaching an agreement with Iran, they did not want that to happen and they wanted to make sure that Mr. Rohani was discredited as an agent.

The fact that Mr. Rohani has steadfastly insisted that Iran is ready and able to negotiate with United States is attributed to his diplomatic skills.

Press TV: But Mr. Beeman, we of course know that the US Congress recently endorsed a new set of sanctions against Iran. Would you see that as a move that’s not favored by President Obama himself and what kind of a message do you think that measure is going to send to Iran?

Beeman: Well of course what is shows is that the United States or at least the United States Congress is still hostile to Iran. But I should point out to you that it was only one house of Congress that approved this measure. This was the House of Representatives which is extremely conservative, much more conservative than the US Senate.

And the Senate will not consider this question of sanctions until after their current August recess, so it will be September before the US Senate even considers this.

So for the time being even though this was voted, it has not been put into effect. And I should point out that many, many representatives in the US House of Representatives opposed these increased sanctions.

For instance foremost was my own House of Representatives member, Keith Ellison from Minnesota and I should point out that Keith Ellison has been one of the more reasonable voices having to do with negotiations with Iran.

Another one is Senator Ron Wyden and so we have people in the US government who are trying to pursue a more reasonable path of negotiations with Iran.

Press TV: But you see Mr. Beeman, sorry for jumping in here, just quickly I want to get this reaction from you as well and that is in the nuclear talks as well we"ve seen this approach by the West basically that’s more like as Mr. Rohani called it a carrot and stick policy, one of diplomacy besides sanctions are talks besides threats.

Why do you think this approach is being used against Iran and do you think this kind of approach is going to pursuit even with the backing of President Obama?

Beeman: Well first of all I should repeat it I have many, many times that there is absolutely no proof anywhere by any intelligence agency or any military organization that Iran actually has a nuclear weapons program.

Nevertheless, the propaganda against Iran has been such that in the United States even President Obama has talked about Iranian nuclear weapons. This is a major falsehood on the part of the American right-wing.

And we have to understand that the internal politics within the United States make it very difficult for even President Obama in the most reasonable circumstances to try to pursue negotiations with Iran, to try to solve these differences in opinion about what Iran is doing.

So on the one hand it"s true that the United States is trying to, the United States executive branch that is President Obama and the State Department, are trying to push for more reasonable talks with Iran and a rapprochement but at the same time the right-wing in United States is still very militant and believes that an attack against Iran or increased sanctions are the only way that Iran is going to somehow capitulate and we don"t expect, President Rohani has said so and I don"t expect either that Iran is going to give up its rights to peaceful use of nuclear energy under the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty and I frankly don"t think they should.